<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 438 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104387</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the dispute raised by the respondent regarding the alleged debt was bona fide and should be adjudicated in a civil court rather than through winding-up proceedings. The respondent was directed to pay interest at 15% per annum on the admitted amount and costs to the petitioner. The winding-up petition was ultimately disposed of by the court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:32:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 438 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104387</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the dispute raised by the respondent regarding the alleged debt was bona fide and should be adjudicated in a civil court rather than through winding-up proceedings. The respondent was directed to pay interest at 15% per annum on the admitted amount and costs to the petitioner. The winding-up petition was ultimately disposed of by the court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>