<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 489 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104381</link>
    <description>Notification No. 175/86-C.E. granted a concessional duty rate to small scale manufacturers only where the scheme conditions, including use of Modvat credit on eligible inputs for specified final products, were satisfied. Where the inputs were exempted, or credit was not available or not availed, the manufacturer could not claim that concessional benefit. On the facts noted in the notice, the exemption-linked inputs and absence of credit support meant the benefit was unavailable, and the duty demand was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:22:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 489 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104381</link>
      <description>Notification No. 175/86-C.E. granted a concessional duty rate to small scale manufacturers only where the scheme conditions, including use of Modvat credit on eligible inputs for specified final products, were satisfied. Where the inputs were exempted, or credit was not available or not availed, the manufacturer could not claim that concessional benefit. On the facts noted in the notice, the exemption-linked inputs and absence of credit support meant the benefit was unavailable, and the duty demand was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>