<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 580 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104376</link>
    <description>Components of machinery cleared without claiming exemption under Notifications 175/86 and 1/93 were not outside the exemption merely because their use as original equipment was not known at clearance. Where the buyer did not initiate the prescribed Chapter X procedure, the manufacturer was justified in clearing the goods without exemption, and later use as original equipment did not affect the legality of that clearance. The record also showed disclosure of the nature of the goods and no established suppression of facts, so the extended limitation period could not be invoked. The demand was unsustainable on merits and limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:15:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 580 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104376</link>
      <description>Components of machinery cleared without claiming exemption under Notifications 175/86 and 1/93 were not outside the exemption merely because their use as original equipment was not known at clearance. Where the buyer did not initiate the prescribed Chapter X procedure, the manufacturer was justified in clearing the goods without exemption, and later use as original equipment did not affect the legality of that clearance. The record also showed disclosure of the nature of the goods and no established suppression of facts, so the extended limitation period could not be invoked. The demand was unsustainable on merits and limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>