<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 420 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104368</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai, dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal regarding the assessable value of goods received by a manufacturer. The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals) decision that the Department could not add a notional profit margin to the assessable value as the manufacturer&#039;s profit had already been included. Emphasizing the distinction between manufacturing profit and the profit accrued to the manufacturer, the Tribunal referenced the Supreme Court&#039;s decision and clarified that any inclusion beyond specified elements would exceed the notice&#039;s scope. Consequently, the Tribunal affirmed that the manufacturer&#039;s profit margin had been adequately considered in the assessment, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:02:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 420 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104368</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai, dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal regarding the assessable value of goods received by a manufacturer. The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals) decision that the Department could not add a notional profit margin to the assessable value as the manufacturer&#039;s profit had already been included. Emphasizing the distinction between manufacturing profit and the profit accrued to the manufacturer, the Tribunal referenced the Supreme Court&#039;s decision and clarified that any inclusion beyond specified elements would exceed the notice&#039;s scope. Consequently, the Tribunal affirmed that the manufacturer&#039;s profit margin had been adequately considered in the assessment, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>