<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 477 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104355</link>
    <description>Prospective bidders with no direct lis in the dispute over a company&#039;s liquidation sale have no locus standi to be impleaded or heard as interveners, because their role is limited to bidding when the asset is offered for sale. An agreement to sell executed before winding up does not create any interest in immovable property or confer an exclusive purchase right after liquidation. The liquidator and court must sell company assets in a manner that secures the best realizable value for creditors, and a prior unimplemented agreement cannot displace that duty or justify preferential treatment for one claimant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:34:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 477 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104355</link>
      <description>Prospective bidders with no direct lis in the dispute over a company&#039;s liquidation sale have no locus standi to be impleaded or heard as interveners, because their role is limited to bidding when the asset is offered for sale. An agreement to sell executed before winding up does not create any interest in immovable property or confer an exclusive purchase right after liquidation. The liquidator and court must sell company assets in a manner that secures the best realizable value for creditors, and a prior unimplemented agreement cannot displace that duty or justify preferential treatment for one claimant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>