https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104350 The High Court of Delhi asserted jurisdiction to order the respondent to deposit amounts as per National Commission orders, despite pending proceedings. The court directed the respondent to comply with refund orders, appointing a provisional liquidator and setting payment deadlines. Dismissing objections, the court ordered disbursement to flat buyers and upheld the 18% interest rate, emphasizing prompt payment and rejecting delays. The respondent's objections were dismissed, and compliance with court directives for full payment to flat buyers was mandated. en-us Mon, 14 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:27:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104350 The High Court of Delhi asserted jurisdiction to order the respondent to deposit amounts as per National Commission orders, despite pending proceedings. The court directed the respondent to comply with refund orders, appointing a provisional liquidator and setting payment deadlines. Dismissing objections, the court ordered disbursement to flat buyers and upheld the 18% interest rate, emphasizing prompt payment and rejecting delays. The respondent's objections were dismissed, and compliance with court directives for full payment to flat buyers was mandated. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 14 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104350