<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 468 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104345</link>
    <description>Pledged shares transferred in favour of the petitioner were treated only as security, as the subsequent correspondence supported that commercial understanding and allowed the set-off question to be examined on that basis. On novation, no material showed compliance with the terms of the petitioner&#039;s offer, and no contract could arise without unequivocal acceptance; the statutory notice was therefore not displaced. The challenge to the rejoinder was rejected, and the affidavit in rejoinder was taken on record. The petition was admitted, while the request for stay was refused and the matter was directed to proceed for hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:18:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 468 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104345</link>
      <description>Pledged shares transferred in favour of the petitioner were treated only as security, as the subsequent correspondence supported that commercial understanding and allowed the set-off question to be examined on that basis. On novation, no material showed compliance with the terms of the petitioner&#039;s offer, and no contract could arise without unequivocal acceptance; the statutory notice was therefore not displaced. The challenge to the rejoinder was rejected, and the affidavit in rejoinder was taken on record. The petition was admitted, while the request for stay was refused and the matter was directed to proceed for hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>