https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104340 An application for appointment of an arbitrator under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was treated as time-barred because limitation under article 137 of the Limitation Act runs from the date the request for reference to arbitration is received, read with sections 21 and 43 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Subsequent reminders do not extend the limitation period. On the stated facts, the request was received in 1994 and the section 11 application was filed more than three years later, so the claim was beyond time and could not be entertained. en-us Wed, 02 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:08:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104340 An application for appointment of an arbitrator under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was treated as time-barred because limitation under article 137 of the Limitation Act runs from the date the request for reference to arbitration is received, read with sections 21 and 43 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Subsequent reminders do not extend the limitation period. On the stated facts, the request was received in 1994 and the section 11 application was filed more than three years later, so the claim was beyond time and could not be entertained. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 02 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104340