<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 461 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104338</link>
    <description>The court admitted the winding-up petition, finding the respondent-company indebted to the petitioner-firm for Rs. 57,38,332. The court concluded that the respondent-company was liable for outstanding dues related to works at specific sites, despite defense arguments being deemed neither bona fide nor probable. The court also found the respondent-company failed to pay debts despite statutory notice and mishandled deductions under TDS. The winding-up petition was ordered to be advertised, with a two-week suspension for a possible appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:01:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 461 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104338</link>
      <description>The court admitted the winding-up petition, finding the respondent-company indebted to the petitioner-firm for Rs. 57,38,332. The court concluded that the respondent-company was liable for outstanding dues related to works at specific sites, despite defense arguments being deemed neither bona fide nor probable. The court also found the respondent-company failed to pay debts despite statutory notice and mishandled deductions under TDS. The winding-up petition was ordered to be advertised, with a two-week suspension for a possible appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>