<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 484 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104316</link>
    <description>The court admitted the petition for winding up the respondent-company based on the petitioner&#039;s claim of non-payment of lease rents. Discrepancies in the respondent&#039;s defense regarding an oral agreement and voluntary adjustments led to a decision to investigate commercial insolvency later. A prima facie case of debt owed by the respondent, amounting to at least Rs. 12,92,012 plus interest, justified the admission of the winding-up petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:35:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 484 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104316</link>
      <description>The court admitted the petition for winding up the respondent-company based on the petitioner&#039;s claim of non-payment of lease rents. Discrepancies in the respondent&#039;s defense regarding an oral agreement and voluntary adjustments led to a decision to investigate commercial insolvency later. A prima facie case of debt owed by the respondent, amounting to at least Rs. 12,92,012 plus interest, justified the admission of the winding-up petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>