<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 216 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104307</link>
    <description>Synthetic wastes in the form of white mass fibre cut slivers and rovings with mixed fibres were treated as classifiable under Tariff Item 68, not Tariff Item 18(iv), for purposes of additional duty under the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal relied on its earlier decision involving identical goods and applied the same classification principle to the imported material. On that basis, the assessment to countervailing duty under Tariff Item 18(iv) could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:09:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 216 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104307</link>
      <description>Synthetic wastes in the form of white mass fibre cut slivers and rovings with mixed fibres were treated as classifiable under Tariff Item 68, not Tariff Item 18(iv), for purposes of additional duty under the Central Excise Tariff. The Tribunal relied on its earlier decision involving identical goods and applied the same classification principle to the imported material. On that basis, the assessment to countervailing duty under Tariff Item 18(iv) could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>