<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 498 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104306</link>
    <description>Section 19(1) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 applies only where a prior assessment already exists and tax in that assessment was under-assessed, escaped, or otherwise wrongly computed. Because no original assessment had been made for the relevant years, the statutory condition precedent for reopening was absent, and the provision could not be used as a general power to make a first assessment. The reassessments were therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 498 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104306</link>
      <description>Section 19(1) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 applies only where a prior assessment already exists and tax in that assessment was under-assessed, escaped, or otherwise wrongly computed. Because no original assessment had been made for the relevant years, the statutory condition precedent for reopening was absent, and the provision could not be used as a general power to make a first assessment. The reassessments were therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>