<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (9) TMI 259 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104298</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, confirming the inclusion of packing cost in the assessable value of cement. The appeal was dismissed due to the lack of returnability of the gunny bags and the legal obligations regarding assessable value calculation. Previous judgments, including one by the Supreme Court, were considered, rejecting the appellant&#039;s defense of ignorance of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:39:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (9) TMI 259 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104298</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, confirming the inclusion of packing cost in the assessable value of cement. The appeal was dismissed due to the lack of returnability of the gunny bags and the legal obligations regarding assessable value calculation. Previous judgments, including one by the Supreme Court, were considered, rejecting the appellant&#039;s defense of ignorance of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>