https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104296 The District Forum found deficiency in service by the 1st opposite party for not paying the matured amount to the complainant. Despite fraud during transit of cheques, the 1st opposite party was held liable to pay the matured amount. The Commission upheld the District Forum's decision, emphasizing the 1st opposite party's obligation to pay regardless of transit fraud. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the award of the matured amount and compensation for mental agony to the complainant, with costs imposed on the appellant. en-us Wed, 22 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104296 The District Forum found deficiency in service by the 1st opposite party for not paying the matured amount to the complainant. Despite fraud during transit of cheques, the 1st opposite party was held liable to pay the matured amount. The Commission upheld the District Forum's decision, emphasizing the 1st opposite party's obligation to pay regardless of transit fraud. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the award of the matured amount and compensation for mental agony to the complainant, with costs imposed on the appellant. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 22 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104296