<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 443 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104295</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether &quot;sale occasions such import&quot; in s. 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 requires a completed sale before import. The SC held that, applying the principle in s. 3(a), it is sufficient if the contract of sale itself stipulates import, or import is an incident of the contract, and the goods have entered the import stream; the sale need not be completed at the time of movement, as transfer of property may occur later. Since the import of the goods was the direct result of the contract, the SC concluded that the sale occasioned the import, and the transaction fell within s. 5(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 443 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104295</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether &quot;sale occasions such import&quot; in s. 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 requires a completed sale before import. The SC held that, applying the principle in s. 3(a), it is sufficient if the contract of sale itself stipulates import, or import is an incident of the contract, and the goods have entered the import stream; the sale need not be completed at the time of movement, as transfer of property may occur later. Since the import of the goods was the direct result of the contract, the SC concluded that the sale occasioned the import, and the transaction fell within s. 5(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>