<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 555 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104285</link>
    <description>Unpaid consultancy charges can justify interim protection in a winding-up dispute where liability is contested and the debtor alleges defects without contemporaneous complaint evidence. The Bombay HC noted material suggesting the respondent&#039;s chairman had agreed to pay the stated amount, while the absence of correspondence on alleged defects weakened the defence. Instead of immediate winding-up adjudication, the Court ordered an interim deposit in court, permitted the petitioner to pursue a civil suit for recovery, and linked the fate of the winding-up petition to compliance with the deposit direction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:16:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 555 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104285</link>
      <description>Unpaid consultancy charges can justify interim protection in a winding-up dispute where liability is contested and the debtor alleges defects without contemporaneous complaint evidence. The Bombay HC noted material suggesting the respondent&#039;s chairman had agreed to pay the stated amount, while the absence of correspondence on alleged defects weakened the defence. Instead of immediate winding-up adjudication, the Court ordered an interim deposit in court, permitted the petitioner to pursue a civil suit for recovery, and linked the fate of the winding-up petition to compliance with the deposit direction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>