<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 438 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104282</link>
    <description>Duty on grey fabrics lost during processing due to shrinkage was examined as part of the valuation of processed fabrics. The valuation exercise had already treated shrinkage as a component relevant to the intrinsic value of the grey cloth, and the records showed that profit was loaded at 10% with shrinkage stated to be included in that element. On the facts recorded, the revenue did not establish that the 4.26% shrinkage fell outside the added profit component, so the demand on account of shrinkage was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:13:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 438 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104282</link>
      <description>Duty on grey fabrics lost during processing due to shrinkage was examined as part of the valuation of processed fabrics. The valuation exercise had already treated shrinkage as a component relevant to the intrinsic value of the grey cloth, and the records showed that profit was loaded at 10% with shrinkage stated to be included in that element. On the facts recorded, the revenue did not establish that the 4.26% shrinkage fell outside the added profit component, so the demand on account of shrinkage was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>