https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104281 Detention law requires independent consideration of a detenu's representation under Article 22, and processing the file through a forwarding note does not by itself show absence of application of mind where the Minister separately examines and rejects the representation on merits. A delay challenge will also fail where the representation was disposed of within a reasonable time on the facts, particularly when the petitioner approached the Court before awaiting that decision. The detention order was therefore upheld and the petition dismissed, as no legal infirmity was shown in the handling of the representation. en-us Fri, 03 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:56:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104281 Detention law requires independent consideration of a detenu's representation under Article 22, and processing the file through a forwarding note does not by itself show absence of application of mind where the Minister separately examines and rejects the representation on merits. A delay challenge will also fail where the representation was disposed of within a reasonable time on the facts, particularly when the petitioner approached the Court before awaiting that decision. The detention order was therefore upheld and the petition dismissed, as no legal infirmity was shown in the handling of the representation. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 03 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104281