<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 567 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104276</link>
    <description>Ultramarine blue was classified as a pigment, not a chemical, for sales tax purposes under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. The Court relied on dictionary meanings, commercial understanding, trade usage, and prior High Court decisions to conclude that the product is commonly known and used as a colourant or whitener. On that basis, the specific pigment entry applied instead of the residuary chemical entry, and the sales tax authorities&#039; classification was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 567 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104276</link>
      <description>Ultramarine blue was classified as a pigment, not a chemical, for sales tax purposes under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. The Court relied on dictionary meanings, commercial understanding, trade usage, and prior High Court decisions to conclude that the product is commonly known and used as a colourant or whitener. On that basis, the specific pigment entry applied instead of the residuary chemical entry, and the sales tax authorities&#039; classification was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>