https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104270 The Settlement Commission rejected the applications due to the applicant's failure to provide a full and true disclosure of duty liability and explain how it was incurred. The Commission found that the applicant did not admit guilt or adequately explain the alleged under-valuation of imported goods. Despite claiming discounts from the foreign supplier, the applicant lacked sufficient evidence to support this assertion. As a result, the applications were rejected, including those filed by the co-applicant. en-us Tue, 06 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:44:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104270 The Settlement Commission rejected the applications due to the applicant's failure to provide a full and true disclosure of duty liability and explain how it was incurred. The Commission found that the applicant did not admit guilt or adequately explain the alleged under-valuation of imported goods. Despite claiming discounts from the foreign supplier, the applicant lacked sufficient evidence to support this assertion. As a result, the applications were rejected, including those filed by the co-applicant. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 06 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104270