<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 454 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104267</link>
    <description>Modvat/Cenvat credit on inputs used for repairs and maintenance of machinery remained unresolved because the Tribunal referred the issue to the Hon&#039;ble President for consideration by a Larger Bench. The reference was made to reconcile conflicting views on admissibility of credit in such circumstances, so no final determination on the merits of the claim was reached in this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:27:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 454 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104267</link>
      <description>Modvat/Cenvat credit on inputs used for repairs and maintenance of machinery remained unresolved because the Tribunal referred the issue to the Hon&#039;ble President for consideration by a Larger Bench. The reference was made to reconcile conflicting views on admissibility of credit in such circumstances, so no final determination on the merits of the claim was reached in this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>