<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 375 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104266</link>
    <description>The court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation involving two Transferor Companies, emphasizing no double recovery of stamp duty and preventing undue benefit to the Transferee Company. Compliance with the Companies Act provisions was addressed, directing necessary filings and fee payments. The change of name and compliance with statutory provisions were approved, allowing pending proceedings against the demerged company. The sanction was subject to the High Court of Karnataka&#039;s orders due to interconnected schemes. The petition was granted, with the petitioner instructed to pay the Assistant Solicitor General&#039;s fees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 375 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104266</link>
      <description>The court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation involving two Transferor Companies, emphasizing no double recovery of stamp duty and preventing undue benefit to the Transferee Company. Compliance with the Companies Act provisions was addressed, directing necessary filings and fee payments. The change of name and compliance with statutory provisions were approved, allowing pending proceedings against the demerged company. The sanction was subject to the High Court of Karnataka&#039;s orders due to interconnected schemes. The petition was granted, with the petitioner instructed to pay the Assistant Solicitor General&#039;s fees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>