<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 451 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104261</link>
    <description>An appeal was found not maintainable where the memorandum challenged only the order confirming action against the company, while the grounds also sought penal action against the directors. No appeal had been filed against the order dropping proceedings against the directors, so the challenge could not be effectively entertained in the absence of a proper appeal against that separate order. The result was dismissal of the appeal for want of maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:19:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 451 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104261</link>
      <description>An appeal was found not maintainable where the memorandum challenged only the order confirming action against the company, while the grounds also sought penal action against the directors. No appeal had been filed against the order dropping proceedings against the directors, so the challenge could not be effectively entertained in the absence of a proper appeal against that separate order. The result was dismissal of the appeal for want of maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>