<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 771 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104254</link>
    <description>The court rejected the proposed scheme of compromise or arrangement due to lack of proper notice, misleading statements, financial mismanagement, and non-compliance with statutory regulations. The court appointed the Official Liquidator as the Provisional Liquidator to oversee the collection of loans and payment to depositors, ensuring the protection of their interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:09:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 771 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104254</link>
      <description>The court rejected the proposed scheme of compromise or arrangement due to lack of proper notice, misleading statements, financial mismanagement, and non-compliance with statutory regulations. The court appointed the Official Liquidator as the Provisional Liquidator to oversee the collection of loans and payment to depositors, ensuring the protection of their interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>