https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104238 Rule 11 of the CEGAT Procedure Rules, 1982 permitted dismissal of improperly filed appeals at the threshold, while the Tribunal could ordinarily allow time to cure procedural defects in the interest of substantive justice. Where appellants repeatedly failed to file the required supporting documents and did not remedy the defects despite repeated opportunities, the appeals could be treated as non-maintainable. On those facts, the Tribunal found no basis to restore the earlier-dismissed appeals and refused restoration. en-us Wed, 12 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:01:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104238 Rule 11 of the CEGAT Procedure Rules, 1982 permitted dismissal of improperly filed appeals at the threshold, while the Tribunal could ordinarily allow time to cure procedural defects in the interest of substantive justice. Where appellants repeatedly failed to file the required supporting documents and did not remedy the defects despite repeated opportunities, the appeals could be treated as non-maintainable. On those facts, the Tribunal found no basis to restore the earlier-dismissed appeals and refused restoration. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 12 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104238