<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 567 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104233</link>
    <description>Captively consumed Nylon Cord Yarn was valued by reference to comparable goods cleared for home consumption, with conversion cost and related elements added where direct month-wise home-clearance data was unavailable, and that valuation method was upheld as permissible, sustaining the short levy demand. Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was not sustained because the record did not show wilful evasion or deliberate intention to evade duty, so the penalty was set aside. The challenge to the remand portion had already become infructuous after the directions were acted upon and the later order took effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:56:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 567 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104233</link>
      <description>Captively consumed Nylon Cord Yarn was valued by reference to comparable goods cleared for home consumption, with conversion cost and related elements added where direct month-wise home-clearance data was unavailable, and that valuation method was upheld as permissible, sustaining the short levy demand. Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was not sustained because the record did not show wilful evasion or deliberate intention to evade duty, so the penalty was set aside. The challenge to the remand portion had already become infructuous after the directions were acted upon and the later order took effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>