<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 566 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the importers, holding that the value of drawings was not includible in the assessable value of imported cranes under Customs Valuation Rules. It overturned the confiscation of drawings and ordered a re-determination of penalties based on correct classification and duty liability. The case was remanded for the proper classification of goods and consideration of exemption Notification, emphasizing that the drawings were not essential for crane production.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 566 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the importers, holding that the value of drawings was not includible in the assessable value of imported cranes under Customs Valuation Rules. It overturned the confiscation of drawings and ordered a re-determination of penalties based on correct classification and duty liability. The case was remanded for the proper classification of goods and consideration of exemption Notification, emphasizing that the drawings were not essential for crane production.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>