https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104226 An order made by the Chief Justice or his designate under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was treated as administrative in nature because appointment of arbitrators under the Act does not require a judicial order. Since Article 136 applies only to a judgment, decree, determination, sentence or order of judicial or quasi-judicial character passed by a court or tribunal, such an administrative order is not amenable to challenge under Article 136. The special leave petition was therefore held not maintainable and disposed of on that ground. en-us Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104226 An order made by the Chief Justice or his designate under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was treated as administrative in nature because appointment of arbitrators under the Act does not require a judicial order. Since Article 136 applies only to a judgment, decree, determination, sentence or order of judicial or quasi-judicial character passed by a court or tribunal, such an administrative order is not amenable to challenge under Article 136. The special leave petition was therefore held not maintainable and disposed of on that ground. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104226