<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 741 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104223</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petition for winding up based on the petitioner&#039;s claim of non-payment of brokerage fees, citing lack of merit and failure to establish an admitted liability on the part of the respondent company. The judgment highlighted the importance of distinguishing between brokerage fees and professional fees for Chartered Accountants and directed each party to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:38:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 741 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104223</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petition for winding up based on the petitioner&#039;s claim of non-payment of brokerage fees, citing lack of merit and failure to establish an admitted liability on the part of the respondent company. The judgment highlighted the importance of distinguishing between brokerage fees and professional fees for Chartered Accountants and directed each party to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>