https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104217 A strong prima facie case justified waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal where the demand covered a period beyond six months and the limitation issue under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, as applied to Rule 196 and Rule 223A of the Central Excise Rules, had already been referred to a Larger Bench. On that basis, interim relief was granted and the duty and penalty deposit requirement was dispensed with until the appeal was decided. en-us Tue, 14 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:28:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104217 A strong prima facie case justified waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal where the demand covered a period beyond six months and the limitation issue under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, as applied to Rule 196 and Rule 223A of the Central Excise Rules, had already been referred to a Larger Bench. On that basis, interim relief was granted and the duty and penalty deposit requirement was dispensed with until the appeal was decided. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104217