<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 609 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104198</link>
    <description>Once the induction furnace capacity had been finally determined under the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997, the Commissioner could not reopen that final order by reviewing it on his own. The power of review lay only with the competent authority, so proceedings based on self-review were beyond jurisdiction. The impugned order was therefore held to suffer from jurisdictional error and was set aside, with consequential relief available according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:10:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 609 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104198</link>
      <description>Once the induction furnace capacity had been finally determined under the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997, the Commissioner could not reopen that final order by reviewing it on his own. The power of review lay only with the competent authority, so proceedings based on self-review were beyond jurisdiction. The impugned order was therefore held to suffer from jurisdictional error and was set aside, with consequential relief available according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>