https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104182 The court upheld the validity of the order dated 7-7-1989 directing the petitioners to change their registered names, finding it within jurisdiction and based on thorough scrutiny. It dismissed the petitioners' claims regarding the legitimacy of using the name 'Kilburn,' noting the lack of specific consent for the second and third petitioners. The court agreed with the respondents on the jurisdiction of the first respondent in directing the name change within the 12-month period from the registration dates of the companies. Ultimately, the court concluded that the first respondent's order was lawful and compliant with the Companies Act, 1956. en-us Tue, 08 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:47:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104182 The court upheld the validity of the order dated 7-7-1989 directing the petitioners to change their registered names, finding it within jurisdiction and based on thorough scrutiny. It dismissed the petitioners' claims regarding the legitimacy of using the name 'Kilburn,' noting the lack of specific consent for the second and third petitioners. The court agreed with the respondents on the jurisdiction of the first respondent in directing the name change within the 12-month period from the registration dates of the companies. Ultimately, the court concluded that the first respondent's order was lawful and compliant with the Companies Act, 1956. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 08 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104182