<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 485 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104180</link>
    <description>A scheme of arrangement under the Companies Act, 1956 was approved for converting preference shareholders&#039; stake into a loan and arranging payment to them. The objection based on section 80(1), that preference shares could be redeemed only out of profits or proceeds of a fresh issue, was rejected because the shareholders themselves participated in and unanimously consented to the compromise. Section 80(1) was treated as a protection against unilateral corporate action, not a bar to a consensual arrangement that was not prejudicial to the preference shareholders&#039; interests. The scheme was sanctioned and the company was directed to make payment at the earliest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:45:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 485 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104180</link>
      <description>A scheme of arrangement under the Companies Act, 1956 was approved for converting preference shareholders&#039; stake into a loan and arranging payment to them. The objection based on section 80(1), that preference shares could be redeemed only out of profits or proceeds of a fresh issue, was rejected because the shareholders themselves participated in and unanimously consented to the compromise. Section 80(1) was treated as a protection against unilateral corporate action, not a bar to a consensual arrangement that was not prejudicial to the preference shareholders&#039; interests. The scheme was sanctioned and the company was directed to make payment at the earliest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>