<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 639 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104170</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for reexamination to determine whether the imported goods were components for machines or fully assembled machines. The Tribunal emphasized the need for factual verification regarding the manufacturing process and whether it constituted the assembly of a complete machine. The appeals were allowed for fresh adjudication, with the possibility of involving a technical expert if required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:11:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 639 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104170</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for reexamination to determine whether the imported goods were components for machines or fully assembled machines. The Tribunal emphasized the need for factual verification regarding the manufacturing process and whether it constituted the assembly of a complete machine. The appeals were allowed for fresh adjudication, with the possibility of involving a technical expert if required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>