https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104169 A delay of 893 days in filing the appeal was not condoned because the Revenue's explanation-that the appeal had earlier been accepted by the department and was filed later on the Chief Commissioner's direction-did not amount to sufficient cause. The Tribunal held that this inordinate delay was not justified on the stated facts, and the Supreme Court authority cited for some latitude to the State was inapplicable. The appeal was therefore dismissed. en-us Mon, 11 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104169 A delay of 893 days in filing the appeal was not condoned because the Revenue's explanation-that the appeal had earlier been accepted by the department and was filed later on the Chief Commissioner's direction-did not amount to sufficient cause. The Tribunal held that this inordinate delay was not justified on the stated facts, and the Supreme Court authority cited for some latitude to the State was inapplicable. The appeal was therefore dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104169