<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 637 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104168</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit exemption in a duty and penalty appeal was examined on a prima facie basis, taking into account seizure of finished goods, the allegation that one unit was a dummy unit, the absence of evidence of independent manufacture by that unit, and the appellant&#039;s claim of financial difficulty. On that assessment, partial relief was not granted; the appellant was directed to deposit duty and penalty amounts within six weeks, and the matter was listed for compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:57:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 637 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104168</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit exemption in a duty and penalty appeal was examined on a prima facie basis, taking into account seizure of finished goods, the allegation that one unit was a dummy unit, the absence of evidence of independent manufacture by that unit, and the appellant&#039;s claim of financial difficulty. On that assessment, partial relief was not granted; the appellant was directed to deposit duty and penalty amounts within six weeks, and the matter was listed for compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>