https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104154 A winding-up petition, once admitted after both sides are heard, must ordinarily be advertised in the prescribed manner under the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The court may regulate or defer publication at the notice-before-admission stage, or use inherent power to prevent abuse of process, but that discretion narrows after admission. A plea that the dispute is bona fide or that publication may prejudice the company does not, by itself, justify withholding advertisement once the petition is admitted for final hearing. On the facts, the record showed a prima facie case of indebtedness and no abuse of process sufficient to displace the mandatory publication requirement. en-us Mon, 05 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:58:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104154 A winding-up petition, once admitted after both sides are heard, must ordinarily be advertised in the prescribed manner under the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The court may regulate or defer publication at the notice-before-admission stage, or use inherent power to prevent abuse of process, but that discretion narrows after admission. A plea that the dispute is bona fide or that publication may prejudice the company does not, by itself, justify withholding advertisement once the petition is admitted for final hearing. On the facts, the record showed a prima facie case of indebtedness and no abuse of process sufficient to displace the mandatory publication requirement. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 05 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104154