https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104151 The court rejected the respondents' objections regarding the uncertainty in the outstanding debt amount and the validity of the statutory notice not being addressed to the registered office. Despite acknowledging procedural defects in the pleadings, the court deemed them minor and allowed the petition to proceed. The court emphasized the importance of good faith in addressing discrepancies and urged stricter adherence to procedural requirements in the future. The respondents were given four weeks to file objections on merits, and the case was scheduled for further examination on 16-6-1999. en-us Thu, 01 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:56:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104151 The court rejected the respondents' objections regarding the uncertainty in the outstanding debt amount and the validity of the statutory notice not being addressed to the registered office. Despite acknowledging procedural defects in the pleadings, the court deemed them minor and allowed the petition to proceed. The court emphasized the importance of good faith in addressing discrepancies and urged stricter adherence to procedural requirements in the future. The respondents were given four weeks to file objections on merits, and the case was scheduled for further examination on 16-6-1999. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 01 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104151