<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 494 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104148</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the cases to the Company Law Board (CLB) for a fresh decision to determine if they qualified for rectification under Section 111 of the Companies Act. The CLB was directed to expedite the proceedings, considering detailed observations and legal principles outlined by the High Court. The appeals were partly allowed, with costs as incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:51:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 494 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104148</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the cases to the Company Law Board (CLB) for a fresh decision to determine if they qualified for rectification under Section 111 of the Companies Act. The CLB was directed to expedite the proceedings, considering detailed observations and legal principles outlined by the High Court. The appeals were partly allowed, with costs as incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>