<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1013 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104142</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on sockets was denied where a substantial quantity of inputs remained unaccounted for in invoices and records, and the manufacturer failed to establish satisfactory use of the disputed inputs in or in relation to manufacture; the denial of credit was upheld. On penalty, the Tribunal found the original amount excessive in the circumstances while sustaining the substantive demand, and the penalty was reduced to Rs. 50,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:37:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1013 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104142</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on sockets was denied where a substantial quantity of inputs remained unaccounted for in invoices and records, and the manufacturer failed to establish satisfactory use of the disputed inputs in or in relation to manufacture; the denial of credit was upheld. On penalty, the Tribunal found the original amount excessive in the circumstances while sustaining the substantive demand, and the penalty was reduced to Rs. 50,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>