<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 489 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104141</link>
    <description>The Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 require the liquidator to investigate, admit or reject claims, and communicate his decision, while Rule 164 provides an appeal where a creditor&#039;s claim is rejected in whole or in part. The Court held that the expression &quot;any person aggrieved by any act or decision of the liquidator&quot; in section 460(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 is broad enough to include a secured creditor affected by quantification of workmen&#039;s dues. Because that quantification could alter asset distribution and the amount available to secured creditors, the bank had locus standi to seek review of the liquidator&#039;s decision, and the objection to maintainability was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:42:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 489 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104141</link>
      <description>The Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 require the liquidator to investigate, admit or reject claims, and communicate his decision, while Rule 164 provides an appeal where a creditor&#039;s claim is rejected in whole or in part. The Court held that the expression &quot;any person aggrieved by any act or decision of the liquidator&quot; in section 460(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 is broad enough to include a secured creditor affected by quantification of workmen&#039;s dues. Because that quantification could alter asset distribution and the amount available to secured creditors, the bank had locus standi to seek review of the liquidator&#039;s decision, and the objection to maintainability was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>