https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104121 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Central Excise's demand of duty and penalty on the appellants for misdeclaring dutiable products as exempt. Despite the lack of cross-examination of witnesses and the appellants' financial hardship claim, the Tribunal directed a specific predeposit amount to be made by a set date. Compliance with this directive would result in waiving the remaining duty and penalty, with recovery stayed during the appeal. Failure to comply would lead to the vacation of the stay and dismissal of the appeals without further notice, with a scheduled compliance report for monitoring adherence. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:57:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104121 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Central Excise's demand of duty and penalty on the appellants for misdeclaring dutiable products as exempt. Despite the lack of cross-examination of witnesses and the appellants' financial hardship claim, the Tribunal directed a specific predeposit amount to be made by a set date. Compliance with this directive would result in waiving the remaining duty and penalty, with recovery stayed during the appeal. Failure to comply would lead to the vacation of the stay and dismissal of the appeals without further notice, with a scheduled compliance report for monitoring adherence. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104121