<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 994 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104119</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57A remained available even though credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q had been refused for the same goods. The dispute concerned grinding media, and the Tribunal followed the Larger Bench view that refusal under Rule 57Q does not bar input credit where the goods are otherwise eligible as inputs. The assessee&#039;s entitlement to credit under Rule 57A was accepted, and the denial of credit was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:50:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 994 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104119</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57A remained available even though credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q had been refused for the same goods. The dispute concerned grinding media, and the Tribunal followed the Larger Bench view that refusal under Rule 57Q does not bar input credit where the goods are otherwise eligible as inputs. The assessee&#039;s entitlement to credit under Rule 57A was accepted, and the denial of credit was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>