https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104111 The court ordered the restoration of the company's tenanted premises, prohibiting commercial use. The petitioners were advised to seek clarification from the Company Judge due to a prior stay on dispossession. Relief regarding rendering accounts and misappropriation of proceeds was not granted, pending the outcome of the petition under sections 397 and 398. The court found the petition maintainable and dismissed the timeliness argument, allowing the case to proceed. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:38:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104111 The court ordered the restoration of the company's tenanted premises, prohibiting commercial use. The petitioners were advised to seek clarification from the Company Judge due to a prior stay on dispossession. Relief regarding rendering accounts and misappropriation of proceeds was not granted, pending the outcome of the petition under sections 397 and 398. The court found the petition maintainable and dismissed the timeliness argument, allowing the case to proceed. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 19 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104111