https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104108 A judgment based on an incorrect statement made on oath by the State, and acted upon by the High Court, could not be sustained. The Supreme Court noted that the State's rejoinder wrongly stated that the Government Order had not been published in the Official Gazette and had not been laid before the Legislature under section 39 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, when publication had in fact occurred. Because the High Court proceeded on that factual premise, its decision was set aside and the writ appeals were remanded for fresh hearing, with the earlier judgment not to influence the rehearing. en-us Tue, 08 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jul 2016 14:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104108 A judgment based on an incorrect statement made on oath by the State, and acted upon by the High Court, could not be sustained. The Supreme Court noted that the State's rejoinder wrongly stated that the Government Order had not been published in the Official Gazette and had not been laid before the Legislature under section 39 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, when publication had in fact occurred. Because the High Court proceeded on that factual premise, its decision was set aside and the writ appeals were remanded for fresh hearing, with the earlier judgment not to influence the rehearing. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 08 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104108