<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 483 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104100</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the disputes involved complicated questions of fact beyond the jurisdiction of the CLB under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956, and should be decided by a civil court. The court found that remanding the matter to the CLB for a reasoned decision was unnecessary. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:52:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 483 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104100</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the disputes involved complicated questions of fact beyond the jurisdiction of the CLB under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956, and should be decided by a civil court. The court found that remanding the matter to the CLB for a reasoned decision was unnecessary. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>