<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 482 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104099</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking directions for a company to allot rights shares, stating no statutory violation occurred in rejecting the application. It emphasized addressing contract breaches or statutory duties under the Companies Act and relevant laws, directing the petitioner to seek redress through civil suits or appellate authorities. The court clarified the limited jurisdiction of the first respondent and highlighted that denial of rights shares did not constitute consumer wrongs under specific acts. The petitioner was advised to pursue remedies through appropriate legal channels, as relief was denied in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:45:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 482 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104099</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking directions for a company to allot rights shares, stating no statutory violation occurred in rejecting the application. It emphasized addressing contract breaches or statutory duties under the Companies Act and relevant laws, directing the petitioner to seek redress through civil suits or appellate authorities. The court clarified the limited jurisdiction of the first respondent and highlighted that denial of rights shares did not constitute consumer wrongs under specific acts. The petitioner was advised to pursue remedies through appropriate legal channels, as relief was denied in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>