https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104097 The Court dismissed the winding-up petition due to lack of evidence supporting the petitioner's claim as an admitted debt, emphasizing that a winding-up petition is not for resolving disputed claims. The Court highlighted the limited jurisdiction of the company court in such matters, directing the parties to seek other legal remedies and not awarding costs in this case. en-us Wed, 10 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:39:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104097 The Court dismissed the winding-up petition due to lack of evidence supporting the petitioner's claim as an admitted debt, emphasizing that a winding-up petition is not for resolving disputed claims. The Court highlighted the limited jurisdiction of the company court in such matters, directing the parties to seek other legal remedies and not awarding costs in this case. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 10 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104097