<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 432 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104086</link>
    <description>Under the U.P. Sales Tax Act notification, brass wire was treated as an alloy containing copper and zinc, both metals named in the entry. The Supreme Court reasoned that an alloy does not fall outside the notification merely because it contains more than one of the specified metals, unless the wording clearly limits coverage to a single metal. On that construction, brass wire was covered by the notification and fell within the taxable entry as contended by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 15:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=141125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 432 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104086</link>
      <description>Under the U.P. Sales Tax Act notification, brass wire was treated as an alloy containing copper and zinc, both metals named in the entry. The Supreme Court reasoned that an alloy does not fall outside the notification merely because it contains more than one of the specified metals, unless the wording clearly limits coverage to a single metal. On that construction, brass wire was covered by the notification and fell within the taxable entry as contended by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>