https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104080 The agreement was construed strictly on its written terms, and the assignee's obligation to demand specified materials before supply arose only on proof of such a demand. As no evidence of demand was shown, and the alleged trade practice was not part of the written contract and no independent oral term was proved, the respondent-company's defence was treated as neither bona fide nor credible. The court therefore rejected the defence to admission of the company petition and issued a conditional direction requiring deposit, failing which the petition would stand admitted and, on deposit, would stand dismissed. en-us Mon, 01 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:41:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104080 The agreement was construed strictly on its written terms, and the assignee's obligation to demand specified materials before supply arose only on proof of such a demand. As no evidence of demand was shown, and the alleged trade practice was not part of the written contract and no independent oral term was proved, the respondent-company's defence was treated as neither bona fide nor credible. The court therefore rejected the defence to admission of the company petition and issued a conditional direction requiring deposit, failing which the petition would stand admitted and, on deposit, would stand dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 01 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=104080